corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "Jeffrey B. Gibson" <jgibson000 AT mailhost.chi.ameritech.net>
- To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Chronological order of the Pauline Letters
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 19:27:53 -0600
Jim West wrote:
> At 03:12 PM 3/30/99 -0500, you wrote:
> >I would have thought Hebrews didn't belong on the list at all.
> >
> >Licia Kuenning
>
> You are obviously correct. It does not.
>
I doubt if there are any on the list who have studied Hebrews in any depth
who would
disagree with your judgment, Jim. But, assuming that there are List members
who are
only beginning the study of Pauline literature, and who have joined C-P in
order to
benefit from the wisdom of others who have already plunged deeply into this
and other
Pauline questions -- some statement of *why* you feel that Hebrews is not
Pauline
might be in order, don't you think?
Yours,
Jeffrey
--
Jeffrey B. Gibson
7423 N. Sheridan Road #2A
Chicago, Illinois 60626
e-mail jgibson000 AT ameritech.net
-
Chronological order of the Pauline Letters,
Williams, Wes, 03/30/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Chronological order of the Pauline Letters, Licia Kuenning, 03/30/1999
- Re: Chronological order of the Pauline Letters, Chris Cutler, 03/30/1999
- Re: Chronological order of the Pauline Letters, Jim West, 03/30/1999
- Re: Chronological order of the Pauline Letters, Jeffrey B. Gibson, 03/30/1999
- Re: Chronological order of the Pauline Letters, Jim West, 03/30/1999
- Re: Chronological order of the Pauline Letters, Jeffrey B. Gibson, 03/30/1999
- Re: Chronological order of the Pauline Letters, Wieland Willker, 03/31/1999
- Re: Chronological order of the Pauline Letters, Jim West, 03/31/1999
- Re: Chronological order of the Pauline Letters, J.E.Harding, 03/31/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.