cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Cc-uk mailing list

List archive

From: MJ Ray <mjr AT phonecoop.coop>
To: <fc-uk-discuss AT lists.okfn.org>, <discussion AT libresociety.org>, <cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [Cc-uk] [fc-uk-discuss] Good Idea, Bad Implementation
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:01:17 +0000

rob AT robmyers.org
> But to do this they want to make your BY-SA work relicensable as FDL,
> invariant
> sections and all:

Original post is
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc-licenses/2005-November/002809.html

I'm amazed by this. Have they read the FDL?!? With its invariant
sections, other advert clauses and wrongheaded DRM, it's clearly
worse than CC by-sa 2.5 (and I'd hoped for good things with 3.0).

See http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html#problems
and http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html

Thanks for the heads-up,
--
MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask

[Cc-uk] Good Idea, Bad Implementation, rob, 11/18/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] Good Idea, Bad Implementation, Tom Chance, 11/18/2005
  - Re: [Cc-uk] Good Idea, Bad Implementation, rob, 11/18/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] [fc-uk-discuss] Good Idea, Bad Implementation, MJ Ray, 11/18/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Cc-uk] Good Idea, Bad Implementation, Tsiavos,P, 11/18/2005
  - Re: [Cc-uk] Good Idea, Bad Implementation, Tom Chance, 11/18/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] Good Idea, Bad Implementation, rob, 11/24/2005