Cc-uk mailing list

[Neil Leyton <nleyton AT gmail.com>]

Surely this must be an oversight? At least I hope.

The entire integrity of the ShareAlike provision is that Derivative
Works MUST be issued under the same license....

Best,
Neil

On 8/27/05, David Russell <webmaster AT davidarussell.co.uk> wrote:
> I am more than slightly alarmed at clause 2.3 in the Draft License:
>  
> 'You must offer to the recipient a licence to the Derivative Work which must
> be either one with the same terms and conditions as this Licence, or a later
> version of this Licence with the same Licence Elements as this Licence, or
> another Creative Commons licence with the same Licence Elements as this
> Licence, or the BBC Creative Archive general public licence '
>  
> Why should people have the right to re-license my work (particularly under a
> non-CreativeCommons BBC license) under their own terms? If I choose a
> particular Creative Commons license, that is what I want my work to be
> available under, and nothing else
>  
> David Russell
> Concerned blogger
> _______________________________________________
> Cc-uk mailing list
> Cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-uk
> 
> 
> 


-- 
www.fadingways.co.uk
www.fwmusicstore.co.uk
www.fadingwaysmusic.com
www.soulrevolutionaries.org/leyton
www.neilleyton.com
and the brand new: www.neilleyton.co.uk
"I know when it's time for the highway..."