Cc-uk mailing list

["Andres Guadamuz" <a.guadamuz AT ed.ac.uk>]

I think that the response should be an official reply.  

Andres

-----Original Message-----
From: cc-uk-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:cc-uk-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Christian Ahlert
Sent: 21 July 2005 09:52
To: David M. Berry; Ian Brown
Cc: cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright

I certainly agree, but it would be good PR on our behalf if we would not
simply discard the articles as nonsense, even though they are, but offer a
well measured response/clarification. 
IMO these articles represent an opportunity to clarify what CC does. 
We could for example ask the Register if we could respond?
Who would be willing to help with a response?
--Ch

Am 21 Jul 2005 um 9:51 hat Ian Brown geschrieben:

> Orlowski's column is confused, but the John Dvorak column it is based 
> on is just wrong on so many aspects of Creative Commons that I don't 
> know whether to laugh or cry :( 
> _______________________________________________ Cc-uk mailing list 
> Cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org 
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-uk


_______________________________________________
Cc-uk mailing list
Cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-uk