cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Cc-uk mailing list

List archive

Re: [Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright

From: "Christian Ahlert" <christian.ahlert AT oii.ox.ac.uk>
To: "David M. Berry" <d.berry AT sussex.ac.uk>, "Ian Brown" <I.Brown AT cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:51:37 +0200

I certainly agree, but it would be good PR on our behalf if we would not
simply discard the
articles as nonsense, even though they are, but offer a well measured
response/clarification.
IMO these articles represent an opportunity to clarify what CC does.
We could for example ask the Register if we could respond?
Who would be willing to help with a response?
--Ch

Am 21 Jul 2005 um 9:51 hat Ian Brown geschrieben:

> Orlowski's column is confused, but the John Dvorak column it is based
> on is just wrong on so many aspects of Creative Commons that I don't
> know whether to laugh or cry :(
> _______________________________________________ Cc-uk mailing list
> Cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-uk

[Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright, David M. Berry, 07/21/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright, Ian Brown, 07/21/2005
  - Re: [Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright, Rob Myers, 07/21/2005
    - Re: [Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright, Tom Chance, 07/21/2005
      - Re: [Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright, Ian Brown, 07/22/2005
      - Re: [Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright, Ian Brockbank, 07/22/2005
        
        Re: [Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright, Rob Myers, 07/22/2005
  - Re: [Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright, Christian Ahlert, 07/21/2005
    - Re: [Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright, Andres Guadamuz, 07/21/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Cc-uk] On Creativity, Computers and Copyright, R.Corrigan, 07/21/2005