Development of the Creative Commons Sampling license (or license option)

[Lisa Rein <lisarein AT finetuning.com>]

Hi David,

And I think it's safe to say that one does not need a license -- ours 
or anyone else's -- to sample their own work :-)

If *anyone else* were to sample *your* work, even if they were only 
sampling a portion of that work, and redistributing that sample, 
without doing anything else to it, it is *still* a derivative work (ie: 
not the original work in its entirety).

Thanks,

lisa


On Saturday, September 13, 2003, at 04:46  PM, David meme wrote:

> I disagree. I sample everything just to get the sounds into the 
> computer but I am sampling my own work. So it is not derivative...
>
> Still maybe a simple name is best?
>
>
> On Saturday, September 13, 2003, at 09:39  pm, Lisa Rein wrote:
>
> > Also:  Anyone using a CC Sampling license is going to be making a 
> > derivative work, by definition, so it seems logical to steer clear of 
> > using "derivative" in the name.  It's both redundant and confusing.
>
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> L O C A   R E C O R D S
> Stick to What You Don't Know™
>
>         http://www.locarecords.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-sampling mailing list
> cc-sampling AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-sampling