Development of the Creative Commons Sampling license (or license option)

[Cory Doctorow <cory AT eff.org>]

Seems confrontational, rather than reassuring. Is there any widely 
understood context in which people seek out opportunities to *be* 
appropriated, or when being appropriated is a good deal for the 
appropriatee?

Reuse, recycling = Ambiguous -- how is that different from "reuse" by 
burning it onto a CD (permitted under existing CC licenses)?

Resampling = Invented word, inherently hard to understand

Sample free = Not sure why this is better than the more clear, briefer 
"sampling"



On Saturday, September 13, 2003, at 10:02  AM, mark / negativland wrote:

> At 3:42 PM +0100 9/13/03, David meme wrote:
> > Hi Just a few suggestions
> >
> > Music Resampling License
> > Sample Reappropriation License
> > Music Reuse License
> > Music Recycling License
> > Music Sample Free License
>
>
>
>
> ''Sampling and Appropriation License"  would be good. Seems to cover 
> more things and be self explanatory and easy to immediately grasp what 
> it is for...........
>
> And it isn't cute!
>
> mark
>
>
>
>
>
> > Cheers
> > David
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------
> >
> > L O C A   R E C O R D S
> > Stick to What You Don't Know™
> >
> >         http://www.locarecords.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cc-sampling mailing list
> > cc-sampling AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-sampling
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________________
> *******************************************************
>
> HEY!! LOOKEE!! Please note my new e-mail address that I am writing to 
> you from -
>
> mark / negativland <markhosler AT charter.net>
>
>
> My old address at attbi.com is no longer being used.
> _______________________________________________
> cc-sampling mailing list
> cc-sampling AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-sampling