Development of the Creative Commons Sampling license (or license option)

[Cory Doctorow <cory AT eff.org>]

These are sound (heh) suggestions, but allow me to point out that CC 
already has licenses that permit Derivatives and Re-Use.

Talking Disneyland sounds like fun to me!

On Saturday, September 13, 2003, at 01:23  PM, Chris Grigg wrote:

> Cory said:
> > Not tryign to be a PITA, trying not to name the license with 
> > something that is threatening or confusing or hard-to-remember.
>
> I think those are reasonable criteria for the name.
>
> With all respect to David meme, things we might want to avoid might 
> include 'music' 'sound' and 'sampling' since they are heavily laden 
> with pre-existing but incompatible meanings in some of the communities 
> that the license would touch.
>
> How about something more neutral, and, since the license is intended 
> for works in any medium (or mixture of media, for that matter), 
> something not tied to recorded music per se... perhaps more along the 
> lines of:
>
>         Creative Re-Use License
>         Creative Derivative Licence
>         Collage License
>
> (though 'collage' makes potential incorrect assumption about the 
> re-user's choice of technique)
>
> 'Creative Derivative' rhymes (in a primitive way), would I think speak 
> to lawyers (emphasizing the distinction to non-creative derivative 
> re-uses) as well as to laypeople ('creative' being seen as positive), 
> and it has a nice rhythm when spoken aloud.
>
>         --- Chris G.
>
>
> P.S. to Cory: We really should get together and talk about Disneyland 
> some time.
> _______________________________________________
> cc-sampling mailing list
> cc-sampling AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-sampling