cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: discussion of the Creative Commons Metadata work
List archive
- From: Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
- To: lucas AT gonze.com, discussion of the Creative Commons Metadata work <cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: rel="license"
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:04:03 -0500
On Mon, 2005-07-02 at 10:24 -1000, Lucas Gonze wrote:
Thinking in a blue sky mode, my preference would be for the 'license' tag to be a URN. EG: <a href=""http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" rel="http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/RelLicense">cc by 2.0</a>
There's no URN in there. That's an URI, more specifically an URL. URNs look like "urn:ietf:rfc:2141", which, by the way, is the RFC that describes URNs. URNs are real easy to identify because they start with (you guessed it) "urn:".
See this article for more info if you need it:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-uri-clarification-20010921/~Evan
-- Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org> |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Re: rel="license"
, (continued)
-
Re: rel="license",
Andy Powell, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
snowchyld, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Andy Powell, 02/07/2005
- Re: rel="license", Sylvain ZIMMER, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Andy Powell, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
snowchyld, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Lucas Gonze, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Firas D., 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Lucas Gonze, 02/07/2005
- Re: rel="license", Firas D., 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Lucas Gonze, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Kevin Marks, 02/11/2005
- Re: rel="license", Lucas Gonze, 02/11/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Evan Prodromou, 02/11/2005
- Re: rel="license", Lucas Gonze, 02/11/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Firas D., 02/07/2005
- Re: rel="license", Mike Linksvayer, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Andy Powell, 02/07/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.