Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Heather Morrison <hgmorris AT sfu.ca>]

re: non-free licenses: 

May I suggest that it is a subset of the larger Creative Commons community 
that wishes to reserve the term "free" for certain licenses? My idea of free 
obviously is not the same as yours. I don't see anything free at all about 
the commercial realm in any sense of the word; noncommercial is much closer 
to free.

best,

Heather Morrison

On 2012-12-11, at 8:08 AM, Carlos Solís wrote:

> Given that we're talking about Commercial Rights Reserved, why not talk 
> about Derivation Rights Reserved as a clearer alternative to Non 
> Derivatives? Perhaps some users may think that they're no longer allowed to 
> edit their own works. Also it would give a more uniform labeling to 
> restrictions currently considered non-free, not unlike the All Rights 
> Reserved denomination.
> - Carlos Solís
> _______________________________________________
> List info and archives at 
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
> Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses
> 
> In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate 
> in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
> process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community