cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Francesco Poli <invernomuto AT paranoici.org>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:46:51 +0200
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:22:06 +0100 Rob Myers wrote:
> On 04/16/2012 08:58 PM, James Grimmelmann wrote:
> >
> > As long as the parallel distribution really is sufficiently clear
> > and convenient, nothing has been mooted. Anyone who wishes to
> > redistribute
> > or modify the work has the ability to do so readily. They may not be
> > able to modify or redistribute a particular *copy*, but they will have
> > the freedom that matters: to use, share, and change the *work*.
>
> The work is its instances, not the platonic possibility of using it
> elsewhere.
So a book in PDF format is a distinct work from, say, its corresponding
LaTeX code?
I don't think this is a correct distinction to be made, not even from
a legal point of view: in my (non-lawyer) understanding of copyright
laws, those two "instances" are two forms of the *same* work, since a
"mechanical" transformation does not involve creativity, and hence does
not create a separate (derivative) work.
>
> The licenses already allow individuals to install work onto their
> DRM-encumbered devices privately. (IMO, IANAL.) This is as much as is
> currently needed.
This holds for the source/object dichotomy, as well.
Licenses already allow individuals to privately compile their binary
executable programs from the corresponding sources.
You can build an entire GNU/Linux distribution that way (see Gentoo
Linux, for instance).
Yet, no Free Software license forbids the distribution of pre-compiled
binaries: strong copyleft licenses just require that source is made
available in parallel.
A license that forbids *any* distribution of non-source forms does not
meet the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpcCfX5pXqNt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, Anthony, 04/20/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, David Chart, 04/20/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, zotz, 04/22/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, David Chart, 04/23/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, Rob Myers, 04/23/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, Anthony, 04/24/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, Anthony, 04/24/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, drew Roberts, 04/24/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, James Grimmelmann, 04/16/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, Rob Myers, 04/16/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, Francesco Poli, 04/18/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, David Chart, 04/13/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, Anthony, 04/14/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM, Parker Higgins, 04/13/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.