Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Clarification for Non-Derivative License: grayscale from color not a derivative work

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Anthony <osm AT inbox.org>
  • To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Clarification for Non-Derivative License: grayscale from color not a derivative work
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:35:07 -0500

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Sarah Pearson <sarah AT creativecommons.org>
wrote:
> The way the licenses currently work, the question of what constitutes a
> derivative/adaptation is determined by reference to local law. This is the
> case for purposes of BY-SA and BY-ND. Currently, the only exception is for
> synching, which is explicitly deemed an adaptation for purposes of the
> license.

So the part about "a work that constitutes a Collective Work will not
be considered a Derivative Work for the purpose of this License" is
meaningless?




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page