cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Clarification for Non-Derivative License: grayscale from color not a derivative work

From: Kat Walsh <kat AT mindspillage.org>
To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Clarification for Non-Derivative License: grayscale from color not a derivative work
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:01:43 -0500

On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Gregor Hagedorn <g.m.hagedorn AT gmail.com>
wrote:

> Background: Some members of the German Wikipedia discuss to allow
> non-free ND licenses in certain cases (specifically where the English
> Wikipedia is using images under fair use, e.g. book/CD/DVD covers).

::raises eyebrow::

For what it's worth, ND is no better than "all rights reserved" for
the purposes of complying with Wikimedia policy; the justification
would have to be in local project policy as "fair use". But this is a
discussion for another venue.

-Kat

--
Your donations keep Wikipedia free:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
Web: http://www.mindspillage.org Email: kat AT wikimedia.org,
kat AT mindspillage.org
(G)AIM, Freenode, gchat, identi.ca, twitter, various social sites:
mindspillage

Re: [cc-licenses] Clarification for Non-Derivative License: grayscale from color not a derivative work , (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] Clarification for Non-Derivative License: grayscale from color not a derivative work, Kat Walsh, 01/05/2012
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Clarification for Non-Derivative License: grayscale from color not a derivative work, Gregor Hagedorn, 01/05/2012
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Clarification for Non-Derivative License: grayscale from color not a derivative work, Ali Baba, 01/06/2012