cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: "Lucas Gonze" <lucas.gonze AT gmail.com>
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [cc-licenses] current metadata specs?
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 14:03:35 -0700
I am really frustrated by the labor involved in CC licensing for my
own music. It's not clear what I am supposed to do, and the tools are
just a bummer to make work. EG cli-tools doesn't do Ogg.
AFAIK this is the best current documentation --
MP3: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/MP3
Ogg: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/OGG
FLAC: no spec exists
But is it possible that things have changed to the extent that I can
live without any embedded metadata at all, per
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Nonweb_Tagging?
The style defined at http://wiki.creativecommons.org/RDFa looks
radically more convenient than embedded metadata:
...
What about bar.jpg which is displayed in http://example.com/foo via a
&tl;img src="/bar.jpg"> element?
To specify that bar.jpg is licensed, even under a different license,
we can qualify the link with an about attribute:
<a about="/bar.jpg" rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/">cc</a>
...
I would then do the entire licensing process for
http://example.com/foo.flacby publishing this statement:
<a about="http://example.com/foo.flac" rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/">cc</a>
Is there anything else I need to do aside from that?
-
[cc-licenses] current metadata specs?,
Lucas Gonze, 04/21/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] current metadata specs?, Mike Linksvayer, 04/21/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] current metadata specs?,
Eric Garner, 04/21/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] current metadata specs?, Lucas Gonze, 04/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] current metadata specs?,
Terry Hancock, 04/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] current metadata specs?, Lucas Gonze, 04/22/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.