cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
- From: "Jonathon Blake" <jonathon.blake AT gmail.com>
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:02:20 +0000
Massey wrote:
> a) The current Creative Commons NC guidelines allow a company, under
> specific circumstances, to _sell_ material with an NC licence. This is
How is that possible? Both the cases you mention seem to me to fall
Simple.The vendor simply looks at the current CC Guidelines, and says
"Aha., We can sell this product, under this exception." Certain
restrictions do apply, but it is trivial to blow those exceptions to
smithereens.
So they proceed to sell the product.
I figure it is simply a matter of time before CC-NC material shows
upon eBay,and the licensor won't be able to do a thing about.
[ I am about ready to pony up the $1 000 it costs, to a have lawyer
rewrite the CC-BY-NC-SA licence to specify that distribution has to be
gratis, and it it may not be distributed in any manner that even hints
at being a non-gratis transaction.]
> b) The current Creative Commons NC guidelines prohibits government
> agencies ---which includes most public schools and colleges --- from
> using material with an NC licence;
Probably because there is "monetary compensation" involved at some
level or other? Yet I am sure most authors would grant exceptions if
The CC Guidelines permit NC usage by individuals,or non-profit
organizations with tax exempt status.( For the US, it requires both a
specific type of incorporation, and a specific tax exemption. In
other countries, the requirements are for whatever their equivalent
is.
For the UK, I think it listing as a "registered charity",and
incorporation as "limited by guarantee".)
As a general rule, public schools and colleges do not fall into that
exemption.
xan
jonathon
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/07/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Luis Villa, 03/07/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/07/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Luis Villa, 03/07/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Gregory Maxwell, 03/07/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Greg London, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
S. Massy, 03/12/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Greg London, 03/12/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Jonathon Blake, 03/13/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., S. Massy, 03/15/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Jonathon Blake, 03/15/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/15/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Jonathon Blake, 03/15/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/15/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Greg London, 03/15/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Jonathon Blake, 03/15/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Greg London, 03/15/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Jonathon Blake, 03/16/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Greg London, 03/16/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Jonathon Blake, 03/16/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
S. Massy, 03/12/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/07/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.