cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.
- From: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:24:29 +0000
Mia wrote:
one minor clarification: while the CC licenses are not revocable withrespect to those people who have already accepted the work under the
license, the license expressly reserves to the licensor to withdraw
offering the work under the license at any time. Thus, it is
possible to remove content.
Greg wrote:
They want you to not mention a website in your content?
Yes.
They just want me to remove the website.
The owner of the website is being "requested" to remove some of their
content. [They received a similar "cease and desist".]
In both instances, "technical" DCMA violations are the issue.
Or did you distribute someone else's content and it mentions the website?
My content. Originally written by me.
xan
jonathon
-
[cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
jonathon, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
James Grimmelmann, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Mia Garlick, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
drew Roberts, 12/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence., Mia Garlick, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
drew Roberts, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Mia Garlick, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Greg London, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Terry Hancock, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 12/12/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence., Dana Powers, 12/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 12/12/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence., Peter Brink, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Terry Hancock, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 12/12/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence., Terry Hancock, 12/09/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
James Grimmelmann, 12/08/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.