cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.
- From: Terry Hancock <hancock AT anansispaceworks.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:05:42 -0600
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts wrote:
> In both instances, "technical" DCMA violations are the issue.
Not to pry if you don't want to talk about it, but since this is a topic
of general interest: do you mean they feel that your site is violating
the DMCA ("technically"), so that:
1) they can issue a take-down because of DMCA terms (IOW, it isn't
really a copyright/license issue at all)
2) they themselves have violated the DMCA, so the original right to
license the work is in question
3) they feel that, due to some DMCA issue, the terms of the CC license
have been violated by you, so that you are losing your license to
display the work
I think it would be interesting to know what sort of tactic is being
used here, for the benefit others who might find themselves in your
situation (free-licensed works are not meant to be retracted -- any time
that happens, represents some kind of failure for the commons).
Cheers,
Terry
--
Terry Hancock (hancock AT AnansiSpaceworks.com)
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.AnansiSpaceworks.com
-
[cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
jonathon, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
James Grimmelmann, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Mia Garlick, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
drew Roberts, 12/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence., Mia Garlick, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
drew Roberts, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Mia Garlick, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Greg London, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Terry Hancock, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 12/12/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence., Dana Powers, 12/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 12/12/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence., Peter Brink, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Terry Hancock, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 12/12/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence., Terry Hancock, 12/09/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Retracting masterial distributed under aCC 2.0 BY-NC-SA Licence.,
James Grimmelmann, 12/08/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.