cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:57:05 -0500
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 05:03 pm, James Grimmelmann wrote:
> drew Roberts wrote:
> > I don't actually think that the compatibility between the CC licenses is
> > that helpful from a Free point of view as it moves things to the more
> > restricted and less free licenses. See the reasoning of locking BY-SA
> > works out of CCMixter.
>
> Having just BY-SA is better than having BY-SA-Monday, BY-SA-Tuesday,
> Son-of-BY-SA, Soylent-BY-SA, and many other incompatible flavors of
> BY-SA (even if most of them are comparably free). So, while I agree
> with you that compatibility can hurt freedom under some circumstances,
> unnecessary incompatibility generally hurts freedom.
I would not argue about that since I agree with you there., but by the same
token, if an artist or author dislikes the results of plain paralled
distribution enough to craft a custome license, that is liable to be worse
still.
>
> James
all the best
drew
--
(da idea man)
National Novel Writing Month
http://www.nanowrimo.org/index.php
785,006,026 words and counting.
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, James Grimmelmann, 11/27/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Anti-TPM Statement, Greg London, 11/25/2006
-
[cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
James Grimmelmann, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
James Grimmelmann, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
Benj. Mako Hill, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, James Grimmelmann, 11/28/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, drew Roberts, 11/28/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, James Grimmelmann, 11/28/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Rob Myers, 11/29/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, drew Roberts, 11/29/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, James Grimmelmann, 11/29/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
Benj. Mako Hill, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
James Grimmelmann, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
James Grimmelmann, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 11/28/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Jaroslaw Lipszyc, 11/28/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, James Grimmelmann, 11/28/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, drew Roberts, 11/28/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Rob Myers, 11/29/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 11/28/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.