Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: James Grimmelmann <james AT grimmelmann.net>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement
  • Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:46:06 -0500

Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts wrote:
James wrote:
That said, the current profusion of licenses has been generating confusion, and this is not a propitious time to be splitting off new license variants.

I suspect that most of the confusion is because:
* The specific terms are not defined within the license;
* The meaning of the licenses are vague in critical places;

Part of the problem is that knowledge of what places are critical only develops over time. If the key places to be precise had been clear up front, the licenses would have been clear in them. It's only the groping process by which creators look to see whether CC licenses fit their needs -- and complain if they don't -- that has shaken out many of the ambiguities fixed in the 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 revisions. I don't feel confident enough about there not being serious remaining ambiguities to want to split even further.

I'd suggest that creating more variants now will be much better -- both short term and long term --- than doing so in the future.

More licenses also creates more incompatible pools of CC-licensed material. This problem is bad enough when each attribute linked to SA creates its own pool that can't be combined with the other SA pools. Doubling or tripling the number of such pools -- especially without a good sense of which ones would attract significant use -- scares me.

James




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page