Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Mia Garlick <mia AT creativecommons.org>]

i've posted them now as a wiki page... http:// 
wiki.creativecommons.org/DiscussionDraftNonCommercial_Guidelines; the  
PDF is also separately linked & downloadable on this page: http:// 
wiki.creativecommons.org/NonCommercial_Guidelines

On Sep 7, 2006, at 11:13 PM, Dylan Busa wrote:

> Mia
>
> You mentioned in a recent response to this thread that one could find
> guidelines at http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5752. I went  
> here
> and clicked through every link on the page but found nothing. The one
> link saying that the guidelines have been posted 'here' goes to
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc-licenses/2006-January/ 
> 003125.html
> which, from what I saw, is simply a text version of the original
> referencing page.
>
> Please can you help me (and perhaps others like me) find these
> guidelines.
>
> Dylan Busa
> Website and KMS Manager
> Mindset Network
> Office: +27 (0)11 408 4689
> Fax: +27 (0)11 339 1570
> Email: dylan AT mindset.co.za
> Web: www.mindset.co.za
>
> This e-mail (including any attached files) is intended only for the
> addressee and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
> addressee, you are notified that any transmission, distribution,
> printing or photocopying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the  
> sender
> and delete it from your computer. Unless explicitly attributed, the
> opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the official  
> position of
> Mindset.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cc-licenses-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:cc-licenses-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Mia  
> Garlick
> Sent: 07 September 2006 06:27 PM
> To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts
> Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC
> Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?
>
>
> On Sep 7, 2006, at 9:22 AM, jblake AT eskimo.com wrote:
>
> >
> <cut>
>
> > One of the major problems with the CC-NC contract, is that there  
> > is no
> > precise legal definition that is applicable across the board of "non
> > commercial usage".
>
> really? where is the second? i'm only aware of this one: http://
> creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5752 (which is the same as that
> which appears on the wiki: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/
> NonCommercial_Guidelines)
>
> > Compounding the issue is that there are two
> > different guidelines of what "non commercial" means on the CC  
> > website.
> > [One supersedes the other, but the old one does not point to the new
> > one.] Scattered around the net, are at least half a dozen
> > interpretations/understandings of what that contract means to the
> > person
> > who is using the licence.
> >
> > Given the extremely diverse interpretations of the CC-NC licence, it
> > appears that nobody is clear on what it permits, and what it
> > restricts.
> >
> > Note:  I am not a lawyer.
> >
> > xan
> >
> > jonathon
> > _______________________________________________
> > cc-licenses mailing list
> > cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses