cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?

From: Terry Hancock <hancock AT anansispaceworks.com>
To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 05:44:09 -0500

wiki_tomos AT inter7.jp wrote:

At the end of the post you mentioned and checked
(https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc-licenses/2006-January/003125.html
), do you see the scrubbed attachment?

It goes something like this: -------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:
NonCommercialGuidelines(clean).pdf Type: application/pdf ....

The last line of that section is the link to the NonCommercial
Guidelines in pdf.

And that, my friends, is my personal definition of "buried".

*Opposite*, for all intents and purposes, from "published".

Raising the question: "Why?"

Cheers,
Terry

--
Terry Hancock (hancock AT AnansiSpaceworks.com)
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.AnansiSpaceworks.com

Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?, Dylan Busa, 09/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?, wiki_tomos, 09/08/2006
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?, Terry Hancock, 09/08/2006
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?, rob, 09/08/2006
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?, Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 09/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?, Mia Garlick, 09/08/2006