Development of Creative Commons licenses

["Dylan Busa" <dylan AT mindset.co.za>]

Mia

You mentioned in a recent response to this thread that one could find
guidelines at http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5752. I went here
and clicked through every link on the page but found nothing. The one
link saying that the guidelines have been posted 'here' goes to
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc-licenses/2006-January/003125.html
which, from what I saw, is simply a text version of the original
referencing page.

Please can you help me (and perhaps others like me) find these
guidelines.

Dylan Busa
Website and KMS Manager
Mindset Network
Office: +27 (0)11 408 4689
Fax: +27 (0)11 339 1570
Email: dylan AT mindset.co.za
Web: www.mindset.co.za

This e-mail (including any attached files) is intended only for the
addressee and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
addressee, you are notified that any transmission, distribution,
printing or photocopying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender
and delete it from your computer. Unless explicitly attributed, the
opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the official position of
Mindset.


-----Original Message-----
From: cc-licenses-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:cc-licenses-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Mia Garlick
Sent: 07 September 2006 06:27 PM
To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC
Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?


On Sep 7, 2006, at 9:22 AM, jblake AT eskimo.com wrote:

>
<cut>

>
> One of the major problems with the CC-NC contract, is that there is no
> precise legal definition that is applicable across the board of "non
> commercial usage".

really? where is the second? i'm only aware of this one: http:// 
creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5752 (which is the same as that  
which appears on the wiki: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/ 
NonCommercial_Guidelines)

> Compounding the issue is that there are two
> different guidelines of what "non commercial" means on the CC website.
> [One supersedes the other, but the old one does not point to the new
> one.] Scattered around the net, are at least half a dozen
> interpretations/understandings of what that contract means to the  
> person
> who is using the licence.
>
> Given the extremely diverse interpretations of the CC-NC licence, it
> appears that nobody is clear on what it permits, and what it  
> restricts.
>
> Note:  I am not a lawyer.
>
> xan
>
> jonathon
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses

_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses