cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Evan Prodromou <evan AT prodromou.name>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:56:39 -0400
On Fri, 2006-11-08 at 19:04 -0500, Terry Hancock wrote:
The example this started with actually had a game that included by-2.0-licensed media, but that detail seems to have gotten lost.Of course, this is somewhat moot. Why are they using a CC license for software? Use the GPL instead, it's much more clear cut on this issue.
There are already game projects that are using CC licenses for level designs, interstitial video, graphics, and audio, although the game engine itself uses the GPL or something similarly program-oriented.
I agree too (although I think the needs of other recipients, besides the original project, are important too). I also think parallel distribution meets this goal.> You can play stuff on your DRM hardware, but you cannot be allowed to > use that DRM barrier as a way to circumvent the requirement that you > share your derivatives with the original project. I for one agree that should be the goal.
~Evan
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, Greg London, 08/13/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, drew Roberts, 08/13/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, drew Roberts, 08/13/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, Luis Villa, 08/13/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, drew Roberts, 08/13/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, Rob Myers, 08/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Evan Prodromou, 08/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Greg London, 08/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Terry Hancock, 08/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Evan Prodromou, 08/11/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, Terry Hancock, 08/12/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Evan Prodromou, 08/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Terry Hancock, 08/11/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, drew Roberts, 08/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Greg London, 08/12/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, Rob Myers, 08/12/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Greg London, 08/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Greg London, 08/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Rob Myers, 08/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Luis Villa, 08/11/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, drew Roberts, 08/12/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, Greg London, 08/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Luis Villa, 08/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Rob Myers, 08/11/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.