cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: rob AT robmyers.org
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [cc-licenses] Stallman On CC
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 09:37:30 +0000
RMS on the CC licenses (about halfway down the page):
http://www.linuxp2p.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=10771
It's a measured response. Note that CC *do* give details of how many works use
each of their licenses.
I disagree about the sampling license, though. In many ways it is CC's best
license, as it is the only one which genuinely reflects a particular creative
group's "social contract" (samplers) the same way the GPL does for hackers.
And it's not in the interview, but the FSF license pages now recommend the
Free
Art License for art. Which I think is a bad idea. Art needs access to, and to
be accessed by, broader culture.
Incidentally, I emailed RMS about the FDL backdoor. He seemed quite keen on
the
idea. I'm considering investing in a lance and a
- Rob.
-
[cc-licenses] Stallman On CC,
rob, 02/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Stallman On CC, rob, 02/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Stallman On CC,
Alexandre Dulaunoy, 02/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Stallman On CC, Rob Myers, 02/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Stallman On CC,
Jamie Jensen, 02/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] What freedom is?,
j lipszyc, 02/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] What freedom is?,
Mike Linksvayer, 02/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] What freedom is?, j lipszyc, 02/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] What freedom is?, Jamie Jensen, 02/09/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] What freedom is?,
Mike Linksvayer, 02/08/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] What freedom is?,
j lipszyc, 02/08/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Stallman On CC, Greg London, 02/09/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [cc-licenses] Stallman On CC, João Pinheiro, 02/10/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.