Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Daniel Carrera <daniel.carrera AT zmsl.com>]

Rob Myers wrote:
> So FDL compatibility would have to be a CO module. Which is the same  
> as dual-licensing apart from affective derivatives until they are  
> given to the FDL.

A new module may be the best we can get :-(

I am just not comfortable with my BY-SA work having invariant sections 
added on top. It is not what I intended when I made it BY-SA.

This is a difficult question. You saw that I started out strongly in 
favour. But as I've heard arguments and investigated the GFDL, I've 
changed my mind and become opposed. Of course, I reserve the right to 
change my mind agian :)  But right this minute I feel fairly strongly 
against.

Cheers,
Daniel.
--
     /\/`) http://oooauthors.org
    /\/_/  http://opendocumentfellowship.org
   /\/_/  No trees were harmed in the creation of this email.
   \/_/   However, a significant number of electrons were
   /      were severely inconvenienced.