cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: evan AT bad.dynu.ca (Evan Prodromou)
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: CC-License for Transclusion
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:43:25 -0400
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 09:49:21AM -0700, Mike Linksvayer wrote:
> If transclusion is what I think it is (including external content, or in
> the concrete web case, including part of one web page in another wbe
> page), why do you need a separate license? The existing CC licenses, at
> least those that permit derivatives, would handle that case, no?
That kind of begs the question of whether transclusion is making a
derivative work or making a collective work.
~ESP
-
CC-License for Transclusion,
pavan AT gsdindia.com, 04/07/2005
-
Re: CC-License for Transclusion,
Mike Linksvayer, 04/07/2005
- Re: CC-License for Transclusion, Evan Prodromou, 04/19/2005
-
Re: CC-License for Transclusion,
Mike Linksvayer, 04/07/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.