Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Mike Linksvayer <ml AT creativecommons.org>]

pavan AT gsdindia.com wrote:
> I'm working on a transclusion project.
> I thought why shouldn't we have a Transclusion specific License instead 
> of a narrower CC-Wiki license?
> Or a new CC-Transclusion Licence?
> Can we devise one such Licence?

If transclusion is what I think it is (including external content, or in 
the concrete web case, including part of one web page in another wbe 
page), why do you need a separate license?  The existing CC licenses, at 
least those that permit derivatives, would handle that case, no?

If the inclusion is done by reference on the client then my wild guess 
is that maybe you don't need to care about licensing at all, at least to 
the extent people can "frame" other websites without copyright concerns.

Hmm, I guess "client side remixing" 
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc-licenses/2004-February/000407.html 
is just transclusion.

IANAL, etc.

--
  Mike Linksvayer
  http://creativecommons.org/about/people#21