cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: Rationale for CC's GFDL recommendation

From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: Rationale for CC's GFDL recommendation
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:04:20 -0500

On Saturday 19 March 2005 08:52 pm, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Greg London wrote:

>
> > But Attribution on a large gift economy project seems to me
> > to be setting yourself up for a huge flame war, dissention,
> > and bad mojo at some point in the project's development.
>
> I don't think so. Debian legal doesn't have a problem with attribution.
> And the copyright notice provides attribution *anyways*.

Does the copyright notice provide attribution in the CC sense of say BY-SA?
>

all the best,

drew

Rationale for CC's GFDL recommendation, Henri Sivonen, 03/19/2005
- Re: Rationale for CC's GFDL recommendation, Greg London, 03/19/2005
  - Re: Rationale for CC's GFDL recommendation, Daniel Carrera, 03/19/2005
    - Re: Rationale for CC's GFDL recommendation, drew Roberts, 03/20/2005
      - Re: Rationale for CC's GFDL recommendation, Daniel Carrera, 03/20/2005
    - Re: Rationale for CC's GFDL recommendation, Greg London, 03/20/2005
      - Re: Rationale for CC's GFDL recommendation, Daniel Carrera, 03/20/2005
        
        Re: Rationale for CC's GFDL recommendation, Greg London, 03/20/2005