Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: Rationale for CC's GFDL recommendation

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Daniel Carrera <dcarrera AT math.umd.edu>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: Rationale for CC's GFDL recommendation
  • Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:09:34 -0500

drew Roberts wrote:

> > I don't think so. Debian legal doesn't have a problem with attribution.
> > And the copyright notice provides attribution *anyways*.
>
> Does the copyright notice provide attribution in the CC sense of say BY-SA?

It can :-)

This document is Copyright 2005 by the contributors as listed in the
Authors section...


But in any event. Even if it couldn't, the main point is that Debian does
not have a problem with attribution as such. It's about how it's worded in
the license, giving people the right to demand that you remove "any"
reference from them in a derivative work. If you think about it, the word
"any" is too extreme, in a way that the CC most likely didn't intend. It
would allow someone to make me remove things like "my book is better than
Jason's". "Obviously" the CC was thinking of authorship references (like
"this article was written in colaboration with Jason"). If the CC license
made that clear, that'd be ok.

Cheers,
--
Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect,
Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday.
http://oooauthors.org |




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page