Development of Creative Commons licenses

[drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Sunday 06 March 2005 06:36 pm, Greg London wrote:
> drew Roberts said:
> > When I say NOBY, I
> > mean not only attribution not-required (as in SA) but attribution is
> > forbidden, and you cannot put my name to the original work or your name
> > to the derivative. Perhaps in other words, always anonymous.
>
> I think that ought to be an option.
>
> Actually, I think that should have been the default.
>
> The only problem I see now is that SA-NOBY
> won't play with SA-BY, which is unfortunate,
> but I think any large SA project would really
> have to be NOBY for it to survive massive
> contributers.

SA alone would also work, the option to not give the BY would always be there 
if giving the BY became a burden.

Why do you think it is necessary for attribution to be forbidden in a large 
project? I don't see the logic?

all the best,

drew