Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: distribution of licenses

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: distribution of licenses
  • Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:25:16 -0500

On Sunday 06 March 2005 06:36 pm, Greg London wrote:
> drew Roberts said:
> > When I say NOBY, I
> > mean not only attribution not-required (as in SA) but attribution is
> > forbidden, and you cannot put my name to the original work or your name
> > to the derivative. Perhaps in other words, always anonymous.
>
> I think that ought to be an option.
>
> Actually, I think that should have been the default.
>
> The only problem I see now is that SA-NOBY
> won't play with SA-BY, which is unfortunate,
> but I think any large SA project would really
> have to be NOBY for it to survive massive
> contributers.

SA alone would also work, the option to not give the BY would always be there
if giving the BY became a burden.

Why do you think it is necessary for attribution to be forbidden in a large
project? I don't see the logic?

all the best,

drew




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page