Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Mike Linksvayer <ml AT creativecommons.org>]

wiki_tomos wrote:
> (Please note that I am not a lawyer.)

Nor am I.

> Have you thought about introducing a meta-license for that specific purpose?

Yes.

> "All my contributions to this site are under both GNU Free Documentation 
> License version 1.1 or any later version, or Creative Commons 
> Attribution-Share Alike 1.0. In addition, if you use my contribution 
> in a way that would meet requirements of both GNU Free Documentation 
> License of version 1.1 or Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 1.0, 
> then I do hereby permit you to dual license the work created as a result
> in the same set of licenses, GNU Free Documentation License version 1.1 
> and Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 1.0. If you combine my work 
> with any other work that is dual licensed under GNU Free Documentation 
> License of version 1.1 or any later version, and Creative Commons 
> Attribution 
> Share Alike 1.0, then I hereby permit you to dual license the work created 
> as a result." 

I understand that something like this could happen.  Lawyerly types have
lots of details to figure out.  Thanks for your vote of interest.  I'm
real interested too.

-- 
  Mike Linksvayer
  http://creativecommons.org/about/people#21