Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Ricardo Gladwell <president AT freeroleplay.org>]

Hi Rob,

Rob Myers wrote:
> If Pete changes the format to his proprietary format that only his
> software can read, then Pete is imposing a new requirement,
> technologically, to control access and break the spirit of the license.
> The requirement is that you buy his technology that controls access to
> the derived work.

Interesting: so you would agree that distributing a work originally 
licensed under the SA-CCPL in a closed, properietary format when it was 
originally published in an open format is breaking the "technical 
measures" clause? In your opinion, would this only apply if a downstream 
artist modifies a work from open to closed? Does this not apply if the 
original work is published in a closed, proprietary format?

Kind regards...

--
Ricardo Gladwell
President, Free Roleplaying Community
http://www.freeroleplay.org/
president AT freeroleplay.org