Development of Creative Commons licenses

["Greg London" <email AT greglondon.com>]

Ricardo,

Your first message was somewhat hypothetical.
>For example, would it be illegal to distribute the work in a proprietary
>format that would, for example, require expensive software to edit? Does
>the CCPL itself in anyway require a modifiable version be made
>available, similar to the source code clause in the GPL?

Which has brought up all sorts of other variations of
hypothetical situations. I haven't been paying too close
attention to teh discussion, other than to notice it has
been covering all sorts of ground without making much progress.

You might have already done this already, but perhaps you
could focus the discussion by specifically stating what you
want to do or what you want to prevent someone else from doing.

Do you want to be able to distribute a work in a format
that requires the purchase of expensive software to edit?

Or do you want to prevent someone downstream from putting
the work into a proprietary format that requires expensive
software to edit?

>From your first message, I can't tell.
You may have answered this later, but if so, I missed it.

Greg