Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Nicholas Bergson-Shilcock <nicholasbs AT mac.com>]

Hi Glenn,

Thanks for the quick reply! This sounds great: my professor can list
alongside with the credits, where I presume he was going to list what parts
he's paid to use and what parts he's using under fair use, the parts exempt
from the license. 

I take it this means he can then choose any CC license, and still assure the
college he's on firm legal ground (assuming of course that his "fair uses"
are indeed fair)?

Thanks for your help,
    -Nicholas



on 11/30/04 6:40 AM, cc-licenses-request AT lists.ibiblio.org at
cc-licenses-request AT lists.ibiblio.org wrote:

> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:56:13 -0800
> From: Glenn Otis Brown <glenn AT creativecommons.org>
> Subject: Re: CC licenses and documentary films
> To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts
> <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Message-ID: <577005A6-4238-11D9-827C-000A95AE1D18 AT creativecommons.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> 
> this is fine provided the parts where the filmmaker is asserting fair
> use are labeled as such.
> 
> filmmaker could simply say, in the credits or in the text accompanying
> the film, that segments XYZ belong to the third parties and are not
> subject to the cc license and that licensees should make their own
> analysis on whether to use them or not.
> 
> note how MIT does it here: they created their own sort of "restricted
> use" footnote for 3rd party materials that might show up in their cc
> licensed course materials