Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: NonCommercial and recovering costs

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Sean Redmond <sean.redmond AT brooklynmuseum.org>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: NonCommercial and recovering costs
  • Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:24:33 -0400

James Grimmelmann wrote, On 06/22/2004 03:41 PM:
At 11:45 AM 6/22/2004, Evan Prodromou wrote:

So, I'm wondering about making print-out versions of NonCommercial works
for personal use.

Bottom line: I don't _think_ it's in violation of the license, but this isn't an open-and-shut case like it is for you the reader.

Now, for my question. Do folks on this list think it _should_ be a violation of the NonCommercial license for the Internet cafe and the printers to make these copies?

Isn't the cafe or printer just performing a service that is totally unrelated to the license? If it were a violation for a internet cafe to charge a fee for printing, then even if you were going to print it yourself at home, wouldn't it be violation for Hammermill to charge you for the printer paper?

(Related question: how about large numbers of copies? For example, if a professor were to assign _EST_ to her class, and have Kinko's run off copies for all 150 students.)

I used to work at a Kinko's branch that handled most of the course packets for a large University. IIRC, we didn't do a lot of checking but the policy was not to abet violations of fair use (i.e. no copying of whole books) and professors had to sign off on the fact that they weren't using more than was fair when they placed the order.

(Second related question: how about editorial discretion? What if Kinko's was the one who recommended _EST_ to the professor in the first place? What if the Internet cafe recommends _EST_ to its customers and reminds them that they cant print for 3 cents a page? If it offers to sell them pre-preinted copies?)

That would depend on the interpretation of "primary" in 4b:

"You may not exercise any of the rights granted to You in Section 3 above in any manner that is primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation."

If an internet cafe prints out a bunch of copies, they're certainly not violating the spirit of the license if the give it away. They're probably not violating the license if they sell it at cost -- the GPL allows you to recover the costs of distribution (section 1, "You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy"), so it's seems reasonable for CC licenses to allow the same. But if they're making a profit and creating a demand that otherwise did not exist (by displaying the copies and making money off impulse buyers) then aren't they acting as a commercial publisher?

Sean Redmond

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page