Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Glenn Otis Brown <glenn AT creativecommons.org>]

no prob! that's what i do. all very good questions!

On May 26, 2004, at 1:38 PM, Rob Myers wrote:

> On 26 May 2004, at 21:15, Glenn Otis Brown wrote:
>
> > if you don't want attribution, simply say so. the license provides 
> > for revoking the attribution requirement. or don't provide your name. 
> > read the actual text of the attribution clause.
>
> "If You create a Collective Work, upon notice from any Licensor You 
> must, to the extent practicable, remove from the Collective Work any 
> reference to such Licensor or the Original Author, as requested. If 
> You create a Derivative Work, upon notice from any Licensor You must, 
> to the extent practicable, remove from the Derivative Work any 
> reference to such Licensor or the Original Author, as requested."
>
> I'm sorry - I actually read those two as one!!!! So much for speed 
> reading. :-/
> You *can* request removal of attribution. This is great. :-) Yes, it 
> is much more elegant than CC 1.0.
>
> A quick web search indicates that pseudonymous copyright claims are 
> valid under US law, which makes sense. I'm not sure how someone could 
> license something without providing their name at all, though.
>
> Thank you for answering my (unfounded) concerns. Sorry for taking up 
> your time with them.
>
> - Rob.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses