cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Rob Myers <robmyers AT mac.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?
- Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 12:36:47 +0100
On 2 May 2004, at 03:05, Evan Prodromou wrote:
Considering that CC _does_ have a public domain "dedication", which is
different from Attribution-style licenses, it's probably worthwhile,
at least on this list, not to use the term "public domain license" for
those attribution-only style licenses.
Yes, like "Free" software it's a correct but confusing term (in English), although without the historical precedent that Free software has.
I use "weak" for BSD and "strong" for GPL -style licenses. This may or may not be useful generally. :-)
- Rob.
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Rob Myers, 05/01/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Evan Prodromou, 05/01/2004
- Re: keeping CC-SA free, Rob Myers, 05/01/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Greg London, 05/01/2004
-
Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?,
Greg London, 05/01/2004
-
Re: Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?,
Evan Prodromou, 05/01/2004
- Re: Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?, Rob Myers, 05/02/2004
-
Re: Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?,
Evan Prodromou, 05/01/2004
-
Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?,
Greg London, 05/01/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Evan Prodromou, 05/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.