cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Rob Myers <robmyers AT mac.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: keeping CC-SA free
- Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 16:17:02 +0100
On 30 Apr 2004, at 23:16, Mike Linksvayer wrote:
Apache has been far more successful <http://news.netcraft.com/archives/web_server_survey.html> versus Microsoft. Apache is not copylefted.
It had a BSD-style license. The new license is GPL 2.0 incompatible, GPL 3 will allegedly look at patent requirements.
http://www.fsf.org/licenses/license-list.html
IMHO Apache would have been as successful with a strong license as it's a better mousetrap.
On 30 Apr 2004, at 23:33, Nelson Pavlosky wrote:
Of course, but it's important that Creative Commons provide it as ONE
licensing possibility out of its many non-free licenses. A license that
lets people make my work less free than I intended it is not useful to
me. I want to be able to benefit from things built off of my work when
I release it under a gift license. If Creative Commons doesn't offer
that at all, I'll have to start looking somewhere else.
Yes. People are welcome to use asset-stripping licenses (although I have reservations about CC offering them), but I want to use a value-creation one. Have a blog license, have a mash-up license, make the badges pretty. Then have the real licenses as something separate.
(On a related note, I prefer "Free Circulation" to "Free Advertising", as the former is a genuine social and cultural requirement).
It was funny reading Eric Raymonds' recent complaints about Open Source software usability being low due to fragmented development. This is surely what he was boosting in "The Cathedral And The Bazaar". Selling out to make asset-stripping easier is not a good idea. When it doesn't work, it's an even worse idea...
- Rob.
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Rob Myers, 05/01/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Evan Prodromou, 05/01/2004
- Re: keeping CC-SA free, Rob Myers, 05/01/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Greg London, 05/01/2004
-
Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?,
Greg London, 05/01/2004
-
Re: Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?,
Evan Prodromou, 05/01/2004
- Re: Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?, Rob Myers, 05/02/2004
-
Re: Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?,
Evan Prodromou, 05/01/2004
-
Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?,
Greg London, 05/01/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Evan Prodromou, 05/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.