cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: keeping CC-SA free
- Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 12:27:39 -0400
>>>>> "RM" == Rob Myers <robmyers AT mac.com> writes:
RM> Yes. People are welcome to use asset-stripping licenses
RM> (although I have reservations about CC offering them), but I
RM> want to use a value-creation one.
Rob, is "asset-stripping license" a commonly-used phrase or legal term
that I've never heard before, or just a clever turn of phrase? Can you
explain the difference between an "asset-stripping license" and a
"value creation license"?
As an aside, I think we should make a rule on the cc-licenses list:
you're only allowed to throw in one (1) neologism per email
message. B-)
Finally, to wrap up, a question: does anyone know of good mailing
lists or other forums for discussing OFLACC* in more general or
theoretical ways, rather than specifically for Creative Commons
licenses?
~ESP
* My neologism for this email. "Open/Free/Libre Art/Content/Culture".
--
Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Rob Myers, 05/01/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Evan Prodromou, 05/01/2004
- Re: keeping CC-SA free, Rob Myers, 05/01/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Greg London, 05/01/2004
-
Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?,
Greg London, 05/01/2004
-
Re: Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?,
Evan Prodromou, 05/01/2004
- Re: Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?, Rob Myers, 05/02/2004
-
Re: Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?,
Evan Prodromou, 05/01/2004
-
Why is Copyleft? Why is CC-NC?,
Greg London, 05/01/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Evan Prodromou, 05/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.