cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Tom Morris <tom%bbcity.co.uk AT bbcity.co.uk>
- To: <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:40:04 -0000
GNU FDL / CreativeCommons compatibility is a nightmare for wiki owners like
me. I like the CC licence (by-sa), but because quite a number of texts are
taken from Wikipedia which is FDL.
CC seems simpler and there is less lawyerspeak than GNU's licence.
I'd like to be able to build a wiki which has both FDL and By-Sa content in
it.
--
Tom Morris
http://www.bbcity.co.uk
-
Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Lorenzo De Tomasi, 01/06/2004
- Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, Mike Linksvayer, 01/06/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Glenn Otis Brown, 01/06/2004
- Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, Lorenzo De Tomasi, 01/07/2004
- Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, J.B. Nicholson-Owens, 01/06/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Tom Morris, 01/06/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Lorenzo De Tomasi, 01/07/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Evan Prodromou, 01/09/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 01/09/2004
- Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, Evan Prodromou, 01/09/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Evan Prodromou, 01/10/2004
- Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, Wouter Vanden Hove, 01/11/2004
- RE: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, Sunir Shah, 01/09/2004
- Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, Per I. Mathisen, 01/16/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 01/09/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Evan Prodromou, 01/09/2004
- Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, Evan Prodromou, 01/09/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Lorenzo De Tomasi, 01/07/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.