cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Lorenzo De Tomasi <lorenzo.detomasi AT creativecommons.it>
- To: Discussion drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:14:56 +0100
Nathanael Nerode writes "Why You Shouldn't Use the GNU FDL" at http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
Are these problems true?
Is CC Attribution-ShareAlike compatible with Gnu-Gpl? Can I use it as the Gnu-Fdl? What's the best choice for a license for software documentation?
Thank you :-)
-
Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Lorenzo De Tomasi, 01/06/2004
- Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, Mike Linksvayer, 01/06/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Glenn Otis Brown, 01/06/2004
- Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, Lorenzo De Tomasi, 01/07/2004
- Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, J.B. Nicholson-Owens, 01/06/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Tom Morris, 01/06/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Lorenzo De Tomasi, 01/07/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Evan Prodromou, 01/09/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 01/09/2004
- Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, Evan Prodromou, 01/09/2004
- Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?, Evan Prodromou, 01/10/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 01/09/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Evan Prodromou, 01/09/2004
-
Re: Gnu-Fdl or CC Attribution-ShareAlike?,
Lorenzo De Tomasi, 01/07/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.