cc-europe AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Cc-europe mailing list
List archive
- From: Tomislav Medak <to-me AT mi2.hr>
- To: John Hendrik Weitzmann <jhweitzmann AT mx.uni-saarland.de>
- Cc: cc-europe AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Cc-europe] halftime for review
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:03:13 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John Hendrik Weitzmann wrote:
> 4.
>> - under Activities: to change "European legislation" into "European
>> Union legislation"
> ----
>> - regarding Tomislav's comment about European legislation: why exlude the
>> CoE-scope? "European" includes EU and CoE, while limiting ourselves to
>> EU-jurisdictions excludes the CoE. The latter has shown some genuine
>> interest in Public Domain and User Generated Content lately and has been
>> working on several instruments regarding these things. I was present in
>> several working groups at the CoE and CC was mentioned regularly (and even
>> included in official reports). It would be unwise to ignore these entities
>> just for the sake of focusing on the EU.
I might be ill-informed here: my reasoning was that while we could say
that EU legislates, i.e. produces binding norms, which are enacted into
law by the legislature of member-countries or come into effect without
the legislature of member-countries, CoE does that to a far lesser
degree. But, maybe legislation as a term should be replaced with
something wider in scope to include the recommendatory norm-production
by bodies such as CoE. Does this make more sense?
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkngauEACgkQkbN024ZV0z2gYwCgn/uOo5j/6uG7w2zcAaphQC/1
Zt0AoJwD0cMNpsfzWHKQGVI8+KezaRDF
=4SUy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review,
John Hendrik Weitzmann, 04/03/2009
-
Re: [Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review,
Tomislav Medak, 04/08/2009
-
Message not available
-
[Cc-europe] halftime for review,
John Hendrik Weitzmann, 04/11/2009
-
Re: [Cc-europe] halftime for review,
Tomislav Medak, 04/11/2009
- Re: [Cc-europe] halftime for review, Gisle Hannemyr, 04/13/2009
- Re: [Cc-europe] halftime for review, Gisle Hannemyr, 04/13/2009
- Re: [Cc-europe] halftime for review, Paul Keller, 04/14/2009
-
Re: [Cc-europe] halftime for review,
Tomislav Medak, 04/11/2009
-
[Cc-europe] halftime for review,
John Hendrik Weitzmann, 04/11/2009
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review,
Tomislav Medak, 04/08/2009
-
Re: [Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review,
Gisle Hannemyr, 04/13/2009
- Re: [Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review, Paul Keller, 04/14/2009
-
Re: [Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review,
J.C. DE MARTIN, 04/14/2009
-
Re: [Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review,
Paul Keller, 04/16/2009
-
Re: [Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review,
Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, 04/16/2009
-
Re: [Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review,
Catharina Maracke, 04/19/2009
- Re: [Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review, Prodromos Tsiavos, 04/20/2009
-
Re: [Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review,
Catharina Maracke, 04/19/2009
-
Re: [Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review,
Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, 04/16/2009
-
Re: [Cc-europe] MoC draft V0.7, two weeks for review,
Paul Keller, 04/16/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.