baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Baslinux mailing list
List archive
- From: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [BL] Midori web browser
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 17:28:24 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 31 May 2010, baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org wrote:
Please calm down Sindi. I just asked a simple question. I had no idea Midori required so much work to get it running in BL. As far as I have seen Midori is no better than Opera or Seamonkey. Its much better than Netsurf which Slitaz had in its previous release.
I am not upset. I would also like to use other browsers with BL (which is the main reason for investigating xhost at sdf and cjb). But BL is missing a LOT of the dependencies, and to use precompiled ones would require probably later glibc, which would require a 2.6 kernel, and I have not managed to compile one that works. One from Slackware 11 appears to work, but Slackware does not seem to provide modules, just config files for them. Can you make BL work with a 2.6 kernel and modules?
I like Netsurf because it displays all the text while downloading the images. Opera seems to wait until all the images are downloaded (even when told not to display the images) before it will display even the text.
Netsurf does not work at javascript sites.
Puppy has packages for a lot of other browsers (not linked to the package manager in the standard download but at another less official site). If I knew how to get the puppy 2.6 kernel and .ko modules to work in BL I could upgrade glibc and use the Puppy dependencies with those browsers.
You can boot into puppy and run many programs from BL (Opera, Seamonkey, and Firefox if you run them from the directory they unpack into). But not vice versa because of glibc.
DSL appears to be abandoned. The Firefox 2 from there works in BL with a few libraries added. GTK1. Most browsers now require GTK2. Opera 10 is hopeless with BL but the latest (11?) may not require libQt. (Probably something worse).
Is it possible to use older style .o modules with a 2.6 kernel?
Steven, do you plan on a BL with 2.6 kernel at some point?
Three floppy disks?
Sindi
-------------- Original message from baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org:
--------------
What does Midori do better than Seamonkey or Opera, for which we already have
the dependencies (at least if you upgrade to Slackware 11 or Slackware 8.1
libraries, and add
libgtk1 for Seamonkey and libstdc++ and a few X libraries)? If you manage to
install the
Slitaz package in BL then check for dependencies you will find a lot missing,
maybe everything
on your list. BL does not even use Xorg, to start with. Do you know how to
compile Slitaz to
include all
the dependencies (static) and for a not-so-recent glibc (dynamic)? Sindi
-
[BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/29/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/29/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/29/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/30/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/30/2010
- Re: [BL] SliTaz and Xorg (was: Midori web browser), baslinux, 05/30/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/30/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/30/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/31/2010
- Re: [BL] Midori web browser, baslinux, 05/31/2010
- Re: [BL] Midori web browser, baslinux, 05/31/2010
- Re: [BL] Midori web browser, baslinux, 05/31/2010
- Re: [BL] Midori web browser, baslinux, 05/31/2010
- Re: [BL] Midori web browser, baslinux, 05/31/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/31/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/30/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/30/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/30/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/29/2010
-
Re: [BL] Midori web browser,
baslinux, 05/29/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.