baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Baslinux mailing list
List archive
- From: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [BL] HD boot = 4x greater ram usage?
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:06:41 +1200
Message from Steven
===================
> /($) free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 31088 21456 9632 664 17556
> Swap: 0 0 0
> Total: 31088 21456 9632
Most of the 21456 is currently being used for buffers.
> except that when I start from DOS using HD.BAT,
Is HD.BAT a typographical error? The DOS version
usually runs from BOOT.BAT.
> the "used" figure is 4500 instead of 21456.
When "used" is 4500, what is the "buffers" value?
Cheers,
Steven
-
[BL] HD boot = 4x greater ram usage?,
baslinux, 08/05/2009
-
Re: [BL] HD boot = 4x greater ram usage?,
baslinux, 08/05/2009
-
Re: [BL] HD boot = 4x greater ram usage?,
baslinux, 08/05/2009
-
Re: [BL] HD boot = 4x greater ram usage?,
baslinux, 08/05/2009
-
Re: [BL] HD boot = 4x greater ram usage?,
baslinux, 08/05/2009
- Re: [BL] HD boot = 4x greater ram usage?, baslinux, 08/05/2009
-
Re: [BL] HD boot = 4x greater ram usage?,
baslinux, 08/05/2009
-
Re: [BL] HD boot = 4x greater ram usage?,
baslinux, 08/05/2009
-
Re: [BL] HD boot = 4x greater ram usage?,
baslinux, 08/05/2009
-
Re: [BL] HD boot = 4x greater ram usage?,
baslinux, 08/05/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.