Baslinux mailing list

[Sindi Keesan <keesan AT iamjlamb.com>]

I got the following message about a mail that the list apparently tried to
send from me to a clicvu.com address which could not receive return mail.  
It looks like whoever is using that address cannot receive mails from the
list.

The clicvu-com address that sent me netsky.p@MM is, like Steven's address, 
a 'disposable email adress'.  So someone is using an antispam type of 
address to send the list worms.  How does one deal with this?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON AT foxxy.triohost.com>
Received: from web01-nyc.clicvu.com (web01-nyc.clicvu.com [209.10.150.71])
        by foxxy.triohost.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i418jBG0011816
        for <keesan AT iamjlamb.com>; Sat, 1 May 2004 04:45:11 -0400
Message-Id: <200405010845.i418jBG0011816 AT foxxy.triohost.com>
Received: from [192.168.0.71] by web01-nyc.clicvu.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64039U1000L100S0V35)
          with SMTP id com for <keesan AT iamjlamb.com>;
          Sat, 1 May 2004 04:43:37 -0400
Received: from [65.110.50.10] by web01-nyc.clicvu.com with SMTP (ClicVU
    Disposable Email Address Service) Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:59:53 -500
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:59:53 -500
From: MAILER-DAEMON AT spamex.com
Subject: Cannot send to 71cm-s9q8 AT dea.spamcon.org
To: keesan AT iamjlamb.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on foxxy.triohost.com
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
        MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63

This was a SpamCon Foundation Disposable Email Address Service generated
email address. You were not the recipient of the original email message
and cannot reply through the SpamCon Foundation Disposable Email Address
Service.

To find out more about the SpamCon Disposable Email Address Service, click
on the below URL: http://dea.spamcon.org

---- Original Message ----

On Sat, 1 May 2004 ichi AT actrix.co.nz wrote:

> Sindi Keesan wrote:
> >
> > This worm appears to have been sent by [192.168.0.71] and 
> > received by the ISP web01-nyc.clicvu.com, which could be 
> > the address of a list member who is not currently active.  
> 
> I have looked through all 98 current list members and none
> of them are @clicvu.com


In most cases the bottom-most received address is similar to the address 
from which the mail was sent, but for a few of us it is not:

........