b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: [b-hebrew] H$TXWH

From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
To: Petr Tomasek <petr.tomasek AT evangnet.cz>
Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>, "Nir cohen - Prof. Mat." <nir AT ccet.ufrn.br>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] H$TXWH
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:44:46 -0700

Petr:

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Petr Tomasek <tomasek AT etf.cuni.cz> wrote:

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 08:00:13PM -0700, K Randolph wrote:
…

>
> Look at Genesis 27:29 there is both WY$XW and WY$XWW for plurals, and in
> Genesis 43:28 there’s WY$TXW. Both cases, the Masoretes gave an assumed
> Qere for a Kethiv, is there any evidence from the DSS that the Qere is
> correct? If not, then stick with the Kethiv.

I think this is methodologically very questionable procedure.

Why?

I find the vast majority of Qere readings incorrect, so why should I treat these differently? Especially when the Kethiv readings make sense?

Petr Tomasek

Karl W. Randolph.

[b-hebrew] H$TXWH, Nir cohen - Prof. Mat., 06/17/2013
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [b-hebrew] H$TXWH, Uri Hurwitz, 06/17/2013
- [b-hebrew] H$TXWH, Nir cohen - Prof. Mat., 06/18/2013
  - Re: [b-hebrew] H$TXWH, K Randolph, 06/18/2013
- [b-hebrew] H$TXWH, Nir cohen - Prof. Mat., 06/18/2013
  - Re: [b-hebrew] H$TXWH, K Randolph, 06/18/2013
    - Re: [b-hebrew] H$TXWH, Petr Tomasek, 06/19/2013
      - Re: [b-hebrew] H$TXWH, K Randolph, 06/19/2013
      - Re: [b-hebrew] H$TXWH, Isaac Fried, 06/19/2013
  - Re: [b-hebrew] H$TXWH, J. Leake, 06/18/2013