b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?

From: George Athas <George.Athas AT moore.edu.au>
To: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:10:47 +0000

Posted on behalf of Lewis Reich <lewreich AT gmail.com>:

It's clear from the Mesha stela, whose inscription is linguistically identical to Biblical Hebrew, that Hebrew and Moabite ( and Ammonite and Edomite) are merely dialects off each other.

Lewis Reich

Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated? , (continued)
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, JimStinehart, 04/09/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, Chavoux Luyt, 04/09/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, john . leake, 04/11/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, George Athas, 04/11/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, R. Lehmann, 04/12/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, JimStinehart, 04/18/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, rob acosta, 04/19/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, JimStinehart, 04/19/2013
  - Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, George Athas, 04/20/2013
    - Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, jimstinehart, 04/20/2013