Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Please use your full name

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Yigal Levin <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Please use your full name
  • Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:55:42 +0200

Dear Sebastien,

Please abide by the list rules and sign your posts with your full name (first
and surname).


Yigal Levin

Co-Moderator, B-Hebrew

-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of S?bastien Louis
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 12:47 PM
To: B Hebrew
Subject: [b-hebrew] Qames hatuph - syllable and sheva


Hello,





I’ve got one question
about the qames and qames-hatuph (linked also with the sheva and the
syllabes). If the qames is
in a closed, unaccented syllable, it is pronounced qames-hatuph. Take these 2
words:
לְבָבְךָ








הָקְטַל




My question is: why do we pronounce "le-va-ve-kha" (and not "le-vov-kha") on
the
one hand; and on the other hand, “hoq-tal”? Both cases
seem to me identical, i.e. a qames in a closed, unaccented syllable. So why 2
different rules?




In
other words, why is the qames in the first case a
qames and not a qames-hatuph since it is followed by a sheva, so in a
closed,
unaccented syllable (I presume the accent falls on the last
syllable)? Or, to say it again differently, why is the syllable "va" in
"le-va-ve-kah" open and not closed, since followed by a sheva?





Many thanks in advance if you can help.


Sébastien
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page