Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Can the six variants of YHWH in Codex L. be discussed openly on B-Hebrew?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: David P Donnelly <davedonnelly1 AT juno.com>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Can the six variants of YHWH in Codex L. be discussed openly on B-Hebrew?
  • Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:54:52 -0500

Can the six variants of YHWH in Codex L. be discussed openly on B-Hebrew?

I would specifically like to ask questions about the Hebrew variant
[yod-hatef segol-he-defective holem-waw-hireq-he]
which occurs in Judges 16:28 in Codex L.

Why specifically did the Masoretes point YHWH
with the precise same vowel points as are found in Elohiym,
in Judges 16:28?

Would a question like the one I just proposed above be considered
linguistic or theological?

My question could certainly be considered theological,
[since Christians happen to believe that scriptures are given by
inspiration of God]
but it also might be considered totally from a linguistic point of view.


The answer of course effects English Speaking Christians,
and Messianic Jews more that others,
because both groups have New Testaments that claim that "all Scripture
is given by inspiration of God"

Sincerely yours,

Dave Donnelly
____________________________________________________________
1 Simple Form: Up to 4 Offers!
Refi to low APR before rates rise. $200,000 for $857/mo. No SSN required.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d45a639be7f7f91d7st01duc
>From bjwvmw AT com-pair.net Sun Jan 30 13:19:39 2011
Return-Path: <bjwvmw AT com-pair.net>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
id 32CB54C021; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:19:39 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on malecky
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled
version=3.3.1
Received: from mail.com-pair.net (mail.com-pair.net [208.74.104.248])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BF74C00C
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:19:37 -0500
(EST)
Received: from oemcomputer (66-81-36-125.nocal.dialup.o1.com [66.81.36.125])
by mail.com-pair.net
(Rockliffe SMTPRA 8.0.4) with ESMTP id <B0022218500 AT mail.com-pair.net>
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:19:37 -0800
Message-ID: <01a201cbc0aa$830c8440$7d245142@oemcomputer>
From: "Bryant J. Williams III" <bjwvmw AT com-pair.net>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:21:21 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Subject: [b-hebrew] David Toshio Tsumura and II Samuel 7:8-16
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:19:39 -0000

Dear List,

Colleague of mine sent the article below to me from a doctoral classmate of
his
when he was at Brandeis.

"Tense and Aspect of Hebrew Verbs in 2 Samuel 7: 8-16—from the Point of
View of
Discourse Grammar"— by David Toshio Tsumura, Tokyo, in Vetus Testamentum 60
(2010) 641-654.

"This article is a revised version of my paper read at the Hebrew Language
session of the XVth
World Congress of Jewish Studies at Jerusalem on Aug. 6, 2009. I have received
helpful and
encouraging comments from scholars such as E. L. Greenstein, G. A. Rendsburg,
Ch. Cohen,
T. Zewi, F. Polak, T. Notarius and J. N. Ford." (Footnote 1)

The article is 14 pages and here is the abstract:
"In Nathan’s second prophetic speech (2 Sam. 7:8-16), at first the flow of
narrative discourse is
carried on by the sequence of the verbal forms qtl—wayqtl—wayqtl (vs.
8b-9a)
but, in v. 9b, the
flow is changed, if not stopped, by the sequence w-qtl . . . w-qtl . . . See 1
Sam 17:38, 2 Sam 12:16. Vs. 9b-11a is what Longacre calls a “how-it
was-done”
procedural discourse and serves structurally as a transition from the Lord’s
past dealings with David in vs. 8b-9a to his future dealings with David in vs.
12-16. Thus, vs. 8b-9a conveys a past fact, and how it was done is explained
concretely by the “procedural” discourse in vs. 9b-11a. Such a
narrative-procedural discourse with the sequence of verbal forms wayqtl. . .
w-qtl can also be seen in 1 Sam 1:4, 7:15-16, 2 Sam 13:18, Job 1:5."

Rev. Bryant J. Williams III





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page