Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] isaac on malk-at, xat-at

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Nir cohen - Prof. Mat." <nir AT ccet.ufrn.br>
  • To: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] isaac on malk-at, xat-at
  • Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:50:16 -0300

isaac,

i agree that the feminine article "at" was involved, but i think only in a
partial way.  as to the first case, melek-malkah, i suggest a two-stage
process.

   stage 1: the feminine article "at" (you) as a suffix was an ancient way of
forming the feminine form of an
   object: melek--> malkat. i believe this was the rule in accadian (tihamat,
ashtoret etc).  as feminine objects
   were originally considered,  as a rule,  somebody's possession, this
became the "smichut form" in hebrew.

   stage 2: the non-smichut form ending -ah was (perhaps later on) reserved
for feminine objects in their own right , but
   this later process "-at--> -ah" was no more related to the word "at".

as to xata-->xatat, this is a different story, since xatat (although
feminine) is not just "feminine xet". actually it is a case of the
ending  "ut" which implies an abstract noun, just like shalem-->shlemut,
sefer--> sifrut, as a rule only in the singular. here, the explanation
"sifrut<--sefer+at" makes no sense. instead, i suggest
"sifrut<--sefer+heiot". once "-ut" was established as a general suffix, and
assuming
a vowel ending "a" for the irregular root "xet" (which ends with aleph), the
diphthong "au" simplified to "a".
i think that a similar construction with the auxiliary verb "to be"  can be
attested in many languages.

nir cohen

On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 20:20:54 -0500, Isaac Fried wrote
> Seems to me: XATAT (חטאת) = XAT-AT (חטא-את).
> Similarly: MALKAT (מלכת) = MALK-AT (מלך-את), *KANARIYT (כנרית) =
> KANAR-HIY)-AT (כנר-היא-את), etc. 
>
> Isaac Fried, Boston University
>
> On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Nir cohen - Prof. Mat. wrote:
> though isaak might claim otherwise. here one should also consider 
> xet-xata)t (vaikra 16:3): xet is the original word and xata)t (sacrifice)
> is the derived one

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page